Allahabad High Court Judge Resigns Amid Cash Inquiry
Details of the Resignation
Justice Yashwant Varma, a judge of the Allahabad High Court, has resigned following an inquiry into a substantial cache of cash found at his residence in March 2025. The inquiry was led by a committee formed by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla. Legal sources indicate that Justice Varma’s resignation effectively halts the impeachment process initiated against him, should he have been found guilty.
According to sources from the Lok Sabha Secretariat, with the acceptance of his resignation, Justice Varma will be eligible for pension and other retirement benefits that high court judges typically receive. Had he been removed through the parliamentary process, he would not have been entitled to these benefits.
Legal Insights on Resignation and Benefits
Supreme Court Advocate on Record, Akanksha Rai, provided insight into the matter, noting that various high courts across India recognize a judge’s resignation as a form of retirement under the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Services) Act of 1954. This perspective indicates that judges who resign are granted similar pensionary benefits as those who retire at the end of their terms.
Rai emphasized that this principle has been affirmed by the Supreme Court, reinforcing the notion that a high court judge’s resignation leads to eligibility for retirement benefits.
Background of the Cash Findings
Justice Varma’s resignation coincided with the day he was scheduled to present his defense before the inquiry panel regarding the corruption allegations. He was given a timeframe from April 10 to April 14 to respond to the charges, with the prosecution having already presented its case in March.
The controversy surrounding Justice Varma began when a significant amount of cash was allegedly discovered at his official residence in Lutyens, Delhi. This incident occurred on March 14, 2025, while he was serving as a judge at the Delhi High Court. The cash was reportedly found in a storeroom adjacent to the servants’ quarters, a claim that Justice Varma has denied, asserting that neither he nor his family has ever kept cash in that location.
Judicial Work and Transfers
Following the discovery of the cash, the Supreme Court intervened by removing Justice Varma from his judicial responsibilities at the Delhi High Court. He was reassigned to the Allahabad High Court, with instructions directed to its Chief Justice to refrain from assigning any judicial duties to him during the inquiry.
The resignation of Justice Varma represents a significant development in a case that has drawn considerable attention in the judicial and public spheres. As legal proceedings conclude with his departure from the bench, discussions regarding the implications of his actions and the broader context of judicial integrity are likely to continue.
Follow US
https://www.facebook.com/charchaexpress
https://www.youtube.com/@charcha-express
https://www.instagram.com/charcha.express/
Contents
Details of the ResignationJustice Yashwant Varma, a judge of the Allahabad High Court, has resigned following an inquiry into a substantial cache of cash found at his residence in March 2025. The inquiry was led by a committee formed by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla. Legal sources indicate that Justice Varma’s resignation effectively halts the impeachment process initiated against him, should he have been found guilty.According to sources from the Lok Sabha Secretariat, with the acceptance of his resignation, Justice Varma will be eligible for pension and other retirement benefits that high court judges typically receive. Had he been removed through the parliamentary process, he would not have been entitled to these benefits.Legal Insights on Resignation and BenefitsSupreme Court Advocate on Record, Akanksha Rai, provided insight into the matter, noting that various high courts across India recognize a judge’s resignation as a form of retirement under the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Services) Act of 1954. This perspective indicates that judges who resign are granted similar pensionary benefits as those who retire at the end of their terms.Rai emphasized that this principle has been affirmed by the Supreme Court, reinforcing the notion that a high court judge’s resignation leads to eligibility for retirement benefits.Background of the Cash FindingsJustice Varma’s resignation coincided with the day he was scheduled to present his defense before the inquiry panel regarding the corruption allegations. He was given a timeframe from April 10 to April 14 to respond to the charges, with the prosecution having already presented its case in March.The controversy surrounding Justice Varma began when a significant amount of cash was allegedly discovered at his official residence in Lutyens, Delhi. This incident occurred on March 14, 2025, while he was serving as a judge at the Delhi High Court. The cash was reportedly found in a storeroom adjacent to the servants’ quarters, a claim that Justice Varma has denied, asserting that neither he nor his family has ever kept cash in that location.Judicial Work and TransfersFollowing the discovery of the cash, the Supreme Court intervened by removing Justice Varma from his judicial responsibilities at the Delhi High Court. He was reassigned to the Allahabad High Court, with instructions directed to its Chief Justice to refrain from assigning any judicial duties to him during the inquiry.The resignation of Justice Varma represents a significant development in a case that has drawn considerable attention in the judicial and public spheres. As legal proceedings conclude with his departure from the bench, discussions regarding the implications of his actions and the broader context of judicial integrity are likely to continue.
