Delhi HC Upholds ‘Fugitive Offender’ Designation for Arms Consultant
Decision by Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court confirmed on Thursday that Sanjay Bhandari, a UK-based arms consultant, will remain classified as a “fugitive economic offender” in relation to an ongoing money laundering case. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna dismissed an appeal submitted by Bhandari, stating that there was no merit in his claims.
This ruling follows a trial court decision made in July 2025, which had declared Bhandari a fugitive economic offender at the request of the Enforcement Directorate (ED). This legal status allows the ED to proceed with the confiscation of Bhandari’s assets.
Extradition Efforts and Legal Arguments
Bhandari’s prospects of returning to India were significantly diminished after a UK court ruled against his extradition. His legal representation contended that Bhandari is “legally living” in the UK, asserting that labeling him as a ‘fugitive’ within this context is incorrect from a legal standpoint.
In contrast, the trial court noted that even though the extradition request had not been successful, it did not absolve Bhandari of responsibility for violating Indian laws. The court emphasized that the failure of the extradition cannot transform the accused into a victim of the legal system.
Follow US
https://www.facebook.com/charchaexpress
https://www.youtube.com/@charcha-express
https://www.instagram.com/charcha.express/
Contents
Decision by Delhi High CourtThe Delhi High Court confirmed on Thursday that Sanjay Bhandari, a UK-based arms consultant, will remain classified as a “fugitive economic offender” in relation to an ongoing money laundering case. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna dismissed an appeal submitted by Bhandari, stating that there was no merit in his claims.This ruling follows a trial court decision made in July 2025, which had declared Bhandari a fugitive economic offender at the request of the Enforcement Directorate (ED). This legal status allows the ED to proceed with the confiscation of Bhandari’s assets.Extradition Efforts and Legal ArgumentsBhandari’s prospects of returning to India were significantly diminished after a UK court ruled against his extradition. His legal representation contended that Bhandari is “legally living” in the UK, asserting that labeling him as a ‘fugitive’ within this context is incorrect from a legal standpoint.In contrast, the trial court noted that even though the extradition request had not been successful, it did not absolve Bhandari of responsibility for violating Indian laws. The court emphasized that the failure of the extradition cannot transform the accused into a victim of the legal system.
